Connect with us


Why Are Former State Department Officials Who Pressured Israel Speaking At A Zionist Event?

Stephen Flatow



Two ex-State Department officials who have spent decades – under both Democratic and Republican presidents – pressuring Israel, will be among the featured speakers at the American Zionist Movement’s national conference later this month. An interesting choice, to say the least.

The AZM’s three-day conference, to be held in Washington, D.C. from Nov. 15 to 17, will include many impressive pro-Israel speakers. Yet it will also feature Aaron Miller and Dennis Ross, whose records of criticizing and pressuring Israel are long and troubling.

Miller was a senior Middle East adviser to Secretary of State James Baker. He helped write Baker’s speeches and helped shape his policies concerning Israel, which are widely considered to have been the most unfriendly American policies toward Israel in our country’s history. And Miller was still defending Baker many years later, declaring in the Los Angeles Times in 2008 that “Baker was tough on Israel when he needed to be, but he was no anti-Semite.” Those who remember Baker’s infamous “[Expletive] the Jews” remark might disagree with Miller’s assessment.

Writing in the journal SAIS Review in 1987, Miller praised Yasir Arafat as “pragmatic,” “conservative” and “moderate.” (Note the year – it was before Arafat was even pretending to recognize Israel’s right to exist.) The term “Palestinian terrorists” did not come easily to Miller’s lips. In that article, he called them “Palestinian fighters,” and described the PLO’s terrorist attacks as “Palestinian operations against Israel.” Indeed.

The following year, Miller helped engineer the first U.S. recognition of Arafat and the PLO. But when a PLO faction tried to launch an “operation” to slaughter Israelis on the Tel Aviv beach and seize the nearby U.S. embassy, the U.S. was forced to cancel its recognition of Arafat. It should have cost Miller his job.

Instead, Miller became a senior Mideast policymaker in the Clinton administration, where he pushed the line that Palestinian violations of the Oslo accords were unimportant, and that Arafat should continue receiving $500-million in U.S. aid each year, regardless of his actual behavior. It was Miller who came up with the idea to remake Arafat’s image by having him visit the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. Brilliant.

In recent years, Miller has spent a lot of time dishing out his “expert opinions” on television talk shows and op-ed pages. He endorsed the Iran nuclear agreement, insisting that “in a galaxy far away, a better deal might have been possible, but not here on planet Earth and not under these circumstances.” He opposed moving the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, saying such a move “puts America’s interests last” and would “signal – no matter how it’s explained – that the U.S. is validating Israel’s claims to the entire city of Jerusalem.” Heaven forbid!

Miller also has harshly mocked supporters of Israel, writing in his book: “American Jews committed to Israel worry for a living – I call this the ‘cosmic oy vey’ syndrome, the tendency to worry about everything combined with an inability to distinguish what is really worth worrying about from what isn’t.” I wonder what the delegates to the American Zionist Movement conference think of that assertion.

Miller’s close colleague, Dennis Ross, played an active role in shaping the same policies – pushing for U.S. recognition of Arafat, downplaying Palestinian violations of the accords and, of course, constantly pressuring Israel behind the scenes to make more concessions.

As a senior aide to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Ross pressured Israel to let Hamas bring concrete into Gaza. Here’s how Ross recalled it: “I argued with Israeli leaders and security officials, telling them they needed to allow more construction materials, including cement, into Gaza so that housing, schools and basic infrastructure could be built. They countered that Hamas would misuse it, and they were right.” That admission came six years too late.

Thanks to Ross’s pressure, Hamas built “a labyrinth of underground tunnels, bunkers, command posts and shelters for its leaders, fighters and rockets,” as Ross acknowledged. They built the tunnels with “an estimated 600,000 tons of cement,” some of which was “diverted from construction materials allowed into Gaza.” (Washington Post, Aug. 8, 2014)

During the past year, Ross has repeatedly pressed Israel to make significant concessions, in exchange for easily reversible rhetorical gestures by the Palestinians. In op-eds in the Washington Post and The New York Times, Ross demanded that Israel halt all Jewish construction in 92 percent of Judea-Samaria. In exchange, he argued, the PA should agree to “normalizing Israeli-Palestinian contacts.” Evidently Ross forgot the PA already agreed to have normal relations with Israel, in the 1993 Oslo accords. Why should Israel have to make more concessions to get something the PA was supposed to have been doing for the past 24 years?

Ironically, the American Zionist Movement conference at which Miller and Ross are scheduled to speak is titled “Zionism Forward in the Spirit of Balfour.” The Balfour Declaration affirmed the Jewish right to the Land of Israel. Yet Miller and Ross have devoted much of their professional lives to undermining and restricting Israel’s rights to Jerusalem and Judea-Samaria.

Moreover, the Balfour Declaration promised a “Jewish national home” and said nothing about any Palestinian Arab state. Yet these two State Department veterans remain devoted to badgering Israel into accepting the creation of a Palestinian state. That would mean pushing Israel back to the indefensible 1967 borders, which would pose a grave danger to Israel’s very existence – precisely the opposite of the “Spirit of Balfour” the conference will celebrate.

Stephen M. Flatow, a vice president of the Religious Zionists of America, is an attorney in New Jersey and the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Inside Sex Tapes, Power the Kremlin and Trump: Nastya Rybka case

Polipace Staff



With bee-stung lips, Nastya Rybka addressed her approximately 130,000 followers in a short Instagram video. The 23-year-old Belarusian said she was ill, which was why she had not attended the press conference last Wednesday. She said she needed rest and would soon “tell everything.” Smiling, she thanked Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, who had campaigned for her release from custody in Moscow.

This seems unusual enough; after all, this is a woman from the escort business who was imprisoned in Thailand, accused of illegal prostitution. In Russia she could face a prison sentence of up to six years. But Lukashenko’s assistance is only one piece of the puzzle in this heady mix of sex, power and politics.

Rybka (“little fish” in English) is a nickname Russian men give their loved ones. The young woman who  calls herself that is actually Anastasia Vashukevich, a colorful figure in a political thriller that has been going on for about a year.

The repercussions reach from Moscow to Bangkok to Washington. At its core, it’s about Oleg Deripaska, the Russian oligarch and aluminum king, and speculation as to whether he might have been one of the secret intermediaries between Russia and Donald Trump’s campaign team in the 2016 US presidential election. Vashukevich played a role that evidently became too much for her at some point.

Vashukevich owes her fame in Russia and beyond to her craving for admiration, Instagram, and opposition politician Alexei Navalny. With her help, Navalny came across one of his most explosive revelations. In February 2018, Navalny presented a 25-minute investigative film on his web channels. He explained that he originally wanted to find out who was behind a 2017 campaign in which young women dressed as sex slaves stormed his office in Moscow. Vashukevich took part in the group’s other similarly provocative campaigns, for example, when several nearly naked girls showed solidarity with US film producer Harvey Weinstein by demonstrating in front of the US Embassy in Moscow.

In a talk show on Russian television, Vashukevich described herself as a “professional man hunter,” and said that she had had relationships with six billionaires, describing one of them in a book to demonstrate the maxim: “This is how you catch a billionaire.” Navalny in some instances compared very intimate descriptions of a yacht trip from this book with real photos from Rybka’s Instagram profile, where she presented herself with the oligarch Deripaska. Navalny’s conclusion was that the anonymous oligarch from the book is Deripaska.

The most controversial discovery in Rybka’s Instagram profile was a video supposedly taken in Norway in August 2016. It shows Deripaska and a man closely resembling top Kremlin official Sergey Prichodko on a yacht. Prichodko operates in the background politically, his main focus being foreign policy. An excerpt from a conversation about Russian-American relations can be heard.

Navalny speculated that this was the missing secret link between the Kremlin and the Trump team, which both sides have so far denied. According to US media reports, Deripaska was a business partner of Paul Manafort, Donald Trump’s former campaign manager. Manafort allegedly owed Deripaska money and indirectly offered him “private briefings.” There is no evidence that the oligarch received and accepted this offer. Nor has there been any confirmation of Navalny’s suspicions, not even from US Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Deripaska described this as a smear campaign and sued Vashukevich and a certain Alexander Kirillov for damages in a Russian court for circulating details of his private life. Kirillov is also a native Belarusian, who likes to present himself as a “sex coach” and operates as Rybka’s “patron.” His exact role in this case is unclear.

No new revelations?

Vashukevich later fueled speculation by claiming she had explosive information about the US elections. In February 2018, shortly after Navalny’s revelations, she was arrested in Thailand, together with Kirillov, for conducting “sex training for Russian tourists,” as it was described by the Russian media. Both begged US media and authorities for help, but Washington did not get involved. Russian media reported, quoting sources from Vashukevich’s circle of acquaintances, that FBI agents questioned her during her detention in Thailand, but she said she “told them nothing.”

After nine months in prison, Vashukevich and Kirillov were deported in mid-February and flown to Moscow. Vashukevich allegedly wanted to fly on to Minsk in her native Belarus but was arrested and spent several days in Russian custody. She is accused of enticing at least two women into prostitution. She denies everything and was released from custody on Tuesday, but the charges remain.

In a Moscow court, Vashukevich asked journalists to pass on her apology to Deripaska and Prichodko. “I’m sorry that everything came to this.” Some see the investigation against her as Deripaska’s revenge. Others speculate that she filmed the oligarch on his yacht with the consent of the Russian secret services. Vashukevich told the court that Deripaska should “settle down.” The exhausted-looking woman promised no new revelations: “I’ve had enough.”

Continue Reading


Deutsche Bank Raided over Russian Money Laundering

Polipace Staff



A money laundering probe stemming from the “Panama Papers” has led police to Deutsche Bank, according to authorities. Prosecutors believe the bank helped clients “transfer money from criminal activities” to tax havens.

German Federal police on Thursday raided the Frankfurt offices of Deutsche Bank. The Frankfurt prosecutor’s office said the raids stemmed from an investigation into suspected money laundering at the German bank.

About 170 law enforcement agents took part in the operation. The investigation revolves around multiple Deutsche Bank employees, including two believed to still be working at the financial institution.

Deutsche Bank said it was “fully cooperating” with authorities. “The case is related to the Panama Papers,” a spokesperson said.

According to prosecutors, Deutsche Bank is suspected of helping some 900 customers setup offshore shell companies in tax havens to “transfer money from criminal activities.” They said some €311 million ($354 million) is believed to have been laundered, citing information gleaned from the so-called “Panama Papers.”

Markus Meinzer, financial secrecy director of the Tax Justice Network, has been quoted “surprised that German officials would finally take action” on information garnered from the “Panama Papers.”

“It has been two years that they’ve been analyzing these files,” Mainzer said. “We have seen in other situations that German prosecutors took very long to take action” against tax avoidance schemes and financial crimes.

The “Panama Papers” data leak comprised some 11.5 million documents and was leaked to German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung by an anonymous source in 2015. At least 28 German entities were identified in the leak, according to reports at the time, including Deutsche Bank.

Deutsche Bank has come under increased scrutiny for lax anti-money laundering mechanisms. In September, German financial regulator BaFin formally ordered the bank to do more to combat money laundering in its institutions.

BaFin also assigned an audit firm to assist the bank in fulfilling its regulatory requirements, saying Deutsche Bank needs to “take appropriate internal safeguards.”

In the past, Deutsche Bank has acknowledged that its anti-money laundering efforts have fallen short of financial rules. In August, it confirmed that even after it was fined for helping Russian clients wash some $10 billion (€8.8 billion), its mechanisms to stop such criminal activity were still ineff

Continue Reading


Trump Threatens Acosta, Again

Polipace Staff



The White House has announced that despite a Judicial order restoring Acosta’s press pass, they will suspend it immediately after the order expires in 14 days.

According, to Brian Stelter of CNN, “Lawyers were already expected to be back in court this week to discuss the timeline for further proceedings. Unless there’s some sort of resolution, CNN will be arguing for a preliminary injunction. Here’s what CNN outside counsel Ted Boutrous told me on “Reliable Sources” before these new developments were known… “

The White House argues Acosta did not follow “basic standards” at a news conference when he scrapped with U.S. President Donald Trump.

In a court filing Monday, CNN said the administration was creating “retroactive due process.” The network tweeted that the White House “is continuing to violate the First and Fifth amendments of the Constitution.”

Continue Reading

Recent Posts


What's Hot

Copyright © 2020 Pace Lattin Inc. powered by WordPress.